Author: root

  • Debit Card Security Takes Spotlight as Point-of-Sale Payment Options Proliferate

    Banking and Payments Intelligence Report
    June 2023

    Debit Card Security Takes Spotlight as Point-of-Sale Payment Options Proliferate

    “Debit or credit?” Not too long ago, the question was a ubiquitous refrain from store clerks nationwide. If asked today, the question would be more complicated. That’s because U.S. consumers have more choices than ever when checking out—and the list may soon grow again. In addition to the litany of credit cards, debit cards, digital wallets, and buy now pay later options, pay-by-bank schemes may finally begin to scale in the U.S. with the introduction of the Federal Reserve’s FedNow Service.

    As the point-of-sale payment landscape becomes more crowded, and banks and other payments providers continue to evaluate customer preferences and patterns of usage across these different platforms, it’s an excellent time to take a closer look at the humble debit card as a guide to the future of payments. 

    Understanding exactly how customers interact with debit cards and how secure they perceive those cards to be is the key to unlocking successful pay-by-bank use cases leveraging FedNow and will help define product strategy for optimizing all real-time payment options, old and new.

    Security is a Pain Point

    One of the most significant issues confronting debit card users today is security. Nearly 1-in-3 non-users of debit cards report “security concerns” as the reason they don’t use a debit card at the point of sale, more than any other reason. They are concerned about transacting directly from the account that, in many cases, holds most of their liquid assets.

    As for debit card users, they have significantly higher customer satisfaction with their primary banks when they feel their debit card is “safe and secure to use.” On average, bank customer satisfaction scores are 174 points higher (on a 1,000-point scale) when customers feel good about security. They are also more likely to have opened new business at their primary bank within the past year. However, just 40% of consumers feel strongly that their debit card is safe and secure. 

    The stats echo the results of a recent JD Power Banking and Payments Intelligence Report, which found that more than one-third (36%) of all banking customers in the United States say they have experienced some financial fraud in the past 12 months. Incidence is highest among consumers under 40, who also happen to be the most prolific users of debit cards and need to adopt pay-by-bank solutions for them to scale. As the potential for fraud grows due to digitization and economic conditions, it will influence customers’ payment choices at the point of sale.

    Building Trust

    The good news for banks is that there is a clear roadmap to developing higher trust levels with debit cards and, eventually, pay-by-bank offerings. The obvious first course of action is to continue ensuring that payment offerings connected to customers’ primary accounts are safe to use with limited instances of fraud.

    According to JD Power research, trust is also earned through timely communication. When asked how a bank can demonstrate it cares about its customers, nearly two-thirds (64%) of customers say they want to be alerted to suspicious activity on their accounts. That is almost double the second-most cited response of “offer a grace period before a late fee or overdraft fee is charged” (36%). It’s a pressing need, as only 31% say they receive alerts about their account activity today. 

    Consumers take many other factors into consideration when choosing a payment method, according to the research. But ultimately, the key to building trust lies in securing the payment method and the underlying account while proactively alerting and helping customers when potential fraud is identified.

    Debit Card Security Paves the Way for Pay-by-Bank

    As banks scale pay-by-bank solutions, security will significantly determine adoption rates and customer satisfaction. The introduction of FedNow, and continued expansion of RTP® from The Clearing House, have the potential to dramatically scale real-time payments, creating a game-changer moment  for banks—if consumers become comfortable with the security of that format.

    A big part of building that reputation for security will come from steps that banks can take now to shore up debit card security. Now is the time to double down on fraud protection, response, and conflict resolution. If banks can successfully demonstrate continued improvements in their ability to protect their customers’ debit card accounts, they will have a better chance of convincing them to try pay-by-bank solutions as they begin to grow.

    Find Our More

    This Banking and Payments Intelligence Report is based on responses from two JD Power analyses. The debit card data was collected from January to October 2022 as part of the 2022 U.S. Retail Banking Satisfaction Study. It included 77,696 responses. The fraud data was collected as part of the May 2023 edition of the JD Power Banking and Payments Intelligence Report, “With Bank Customers Still in a Tenuous Financial Position, Fraud Takes Centerstage,” which included 4,000 responses. This Banking and Payments Intelligence Report is authored by Miles Tullo, Managing Director of Banking and Payments. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Mr. Tullo or to learn more about the underlying research.

    Media Contacts

    Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

  • Ford and GM Adoption of Tesla Charging Network Addresses Major Consumer Pain Point, Sets Stage for Battle about Fast-Charging Standard

    Ford and GM Adoption of Tesla Charging Network Addresses Major Consumer Pain Point, Sets Stage for Battle about Fast-Charging Standard

    E-Vision Intelligence Report
    June 2023

    Ford and GM Adoption of Tesla Charging Network Addresses Major Consumer Pain Point, Sets Stage for Battle about Fast-Charging Standard

    Key Findings

    • Ford and GM Address Biggest Barrier to EV Adoption: The single biggest barrier to consumer adoption of EVs has been concern about the availability and reliability of public chargers. By adopting Tesla’s EV charging network, which is the largest and most reliable network in the country, Ford and GM are clearly focused on alleviating customer concerns about public charging.
    • A $7.5 Billion Question on the Future of Fast Charging: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law introduced $7.5 billion in funding for EV charging infrastructure with a big focus on fast charging, which includes the Combined Charging System (CCS) standard. Tesla does not use this standard. Instead, it developed its own North American Charging Standard (NACS), which Ford and GM vehicles will be adopting beginning in 2024. With over 70% of EV sales soon to be compatible with the Tesla standard, the future of CCS is now in question.
    • What About Everyone Else? Tesla has maintained its lead as the most-considered EV brand among consumers for the past year, with a key contributing factor being charging availability. Charging availability is also cited as a key purchase reason among Tesla buyers. How will this move influence consideration for Ford and GM vehicles and what will happen to consideration and valuation on vehicles that do not adopt the Tesla standard? 

    Executive Summary

    Standards. They may not be the most interesting part of peoples’ daily lives, but they are the critical building blocks that keep our light bulbs screwed in, our trains running on the same gauge tracks and our financial markets moving. They can also determine the winners and losers when new technologies are introduced. Perhaps the most famous example of this is the War of the Currents, which pit direct current (DC) versus alternating current (AC) in a quest to become the dominant form of home electricity.

    Today, similar battle lines are being drawn around the standards used for the nation’s EV fast-charging network. On one side is the Combined Charging System (CCS), a non-proprietary standard used in public charging stations operated by the likes of Electrify America, EVgo, ChargePoint and others. On the other, there is Tesla and its North American Charging standard (NACS). With their decision to integrate Tesla’s standard into their future EVs, Ford and GM have put two very big fingers on the scale favoring NACS. How will it all play out for consumers?

    This E-Vision Intelligence Report dives into key data points trending in each monthly EV Index update, along with other data points gathered from JD Power studies and pulse surveys, to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in EV consumer sentiment.

    Addressing Consumer Pain Points

    Before getting into the potential ripple effects and ramifications of Ford’s and GM’s decisions to join the Tesla charging network, it is important to note that the move addresses a significant consumer pain point. Lack of public charging infrastructure has been the top consumer barrier to EV adoption for the past 12 months, followed by related issues involving range anxiety; time required to charge; and inability to charge at home or work. 

    Tesla simply has the largest and most reliable fast charging network. At nearly 19,500 ports nationwide, Tesla added 1,292 Supercharger ports in the first quarter of 2023 alone. The next closest is EVgo, which currently has approximately 2,250 fast charging ports nationwide and added 250 new ports during that same timeframe, according to the Department of Energy Alternative Fuels Data center.
    When it comes to reliability, no other provider is even close to Tesla. Through the first quarter of this year, 21.6% of EV drivers visiting non-Telsa public charging stations were unable to charge their vehicle. Among Tesla drivers using the Tesla Supercharger network, that number falls to just 3.9%. 

    EV june graph1

    Perhaps not surprisingly, Tesla earns significantly higher customer satisfaction scores than rival EV manufacturers when it comes to using public charging networks. Overall satisfaction with DC fast charging (Level 3) among Tesla vehicle owners is 734 (on a 1,000-point scale), while General Motors is 586 and Ford is 544. The average for all other manufacturers is 558.

    EV june graph2

    Questions About the Future of Fast-Charging

    Together, Tesla, Ford and GM represent approximately 70% of monthly new market sales that will be compatible with Tesla’s NACS standard for fast charging. That’s going to create potential ripple effects across the industry, but perhaps the biggest will be determining what happens to the $7.5 billion in funding introduced under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program. The legislation initially focused the bulk of its attention on fast-charging infrastructure using the non-proprietary CCS standard.

    Immediately following GM’s announcement that it would join Ford on the Tesla NACS standard, the White House issued a statement that EV charging stations using the NACS standard would be eligible for federal subsidies as long as they include a CCS charging connection as well.

    That sounds simple enough, but programming and equipping vehicles originally designed to be charged on CCS to also be charged on NACS is not as simple as it sounds. In addition to requiring hardware that facilitates charging with both standards, software inside the vehicles also needs to be programmed to support both types of charging.  In the near term, this is likely to spur consumer confusion and frustrations over interoperability and compatibility.

    What About Everyone Else?

    Tesla has maintained its lead as the most-considered EV brand among consumers for the past year, with a key contributing factor being charging availability.  However, Ford and Chevrolet are on Tesla’s coattails as the topmost considered brands.  

    EV june graph3

    Each month, overall trends in EV consideration are driven by a complex mix of new model introductions, vehicle-specific incentives and other criteria. While it is not yet clear how Ford’s and GM’s decisions to join the Tesla charger network will influence consumer behavior, the moves are expected to positively affect EV consideration for both brands. It is less clear whether making Tesla’s network available to other brands will negatively or positively influence Tesla consideration.

    With charging availability being a key purchase driver, will Ford and Chevrolet capture more EV shoppers and take market share from Tesla and other brands?

    Methodology

    This JD Power E-Vision Intelligence Report is based on data and insights from the JD Power EV Index, the JD Power 2023 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Public Charging Study, and the JD Power 2023 U.S. Electric Vehicle Consideration (EVC) Study. The JD Power EV Index is an analytics tool to benchmark the growing EV market in the United States. It tracks millions of data points aggregated into six categories—interest, availability, adoption, affordability, infrastructure and experience—to evaluate the progress to parity of EVs with ICE vehicles in the U.S. Each month, the JD Power electric vehicle practice will analyze these data points, and others to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in consumer sentiment that are helping to define the fast-moving EV marketplace. 

    Find out More

    This report was authored by Elizabeth Krear, vice president, electric vehicle practice; Brent Gruber, executive director, electric vehicle practice; Stewart Stropp, executive director, electric vehicle practice; and Kristen Richter, senior manager, electric vehicle practice. The JD Power E-Vision initiative is a company-wide program focused on maximizing JD Power industry-leading EV data, analytics, insights and solutions. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with the authors or to learn more about the underlying research.

     

    Media Contacts

    Shane Smith; East Coast; 424-903-3665; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

  • Unveiling JD Power’s Expanded Consumer Payments Research: A Window into the Future of Payment Preferences

    Unveiling JD Power’s Expanded Consumer Payments Research: A Window into the Future of Payment Preferences

    In an increasingly digital world, understanding consumer payment preferences has become vital for organizations striving to stay ahead of the curve. Recognizing this, JD Power, has expanded our consumer payments research to include four new integrated studies:

    The results of this research shed light on the evolving landscape of consumer payments, emphasizing the need for organizations to develop effective point-of-sale strategies to capture and retain cardholders, foster organizational growth, and drive payment innovation.

    Watch Now

    Discover the in-depth details on the new JD Power Consumer Payments Satisfaction Study powered by 47,000 consumers. we invite you to watch our exclusive video.

    Client-Centric Strategies

    JD Power’s research underscores the critical role of point-of-sale strategies in capturing and retaining cardholders. With the payment landscape evolving rapidly, organizations must adapt and optimize their in-store and online payment experiences to cater to consumer preferences. By embracing innovative and customer-centric point-of-sale strategies, businesses can foster growth and cultivate long-term customer loyalty.

    Armed with a deeper understanding of consumer preferences, businesses can proactively develop strategies to meet evolving needs, enhance customer satisfaction, and drive financial performance. Furthermore, this research acts as a springboard for innovative payment solutions, encouraging organizations to explore new technologies, partnerships, and business models that propel the industry forward.

    Gain firsthand access to the compelling data insights consumer payment preferences with vast sample size, ensuring the inclusion of a wide range of demographic groups, geographical locations, and socio-economic backgrounds. Connect with a JD Power Payments Intelligence expert.

    Contact Us

  • Addressing the NeoBank Account Origination Decline

     Addressing the NeoBank Account Origination Decline

    Neobanks and direct banks are redefining the traditional banking experience by offering convenient and personalized services. However, these innovative institutions are facing a challenge in the form of a decline in account origination.

    Despite these significant gains in customer satisfaction, the number of new customers opening direct bank accounts declined 2% this year, according to the JD Power 2023 U.S. Direct Banking Satisfaction StudySM. The decline in new customer volume is most pronounced (-6%) among neobanks, a subset of the online banking sector that consists of fintech companies that offer online banking services through a partnership with an established bank.

    Watch Now

    To overcome this hurdle and achieve strategic growth, it is imperative for neobank and direct banking leadership teams to adopt a client-centric strategy with a focus on client segmentation. In the short video, Paul McAdam, senior director of banking and payments intelligence at JD Power reveals changes in top reason that drive account origination.

    Actionable Insights

    Neobank and direct banking leadership teams must address the decline in account origination by adopting a client-centric strategy. Client segmentation plays a vital role in this endeavor, enabling banks to tailor their offerings and experiences to different customer segments. The insights provided by JD Power’s Direct Banking Study offer a valuable resource to inform decision-making and drive strategic growth. By embracing client segmentation and leveraging custom research, neobank and direct banking leadership teams can position themselves for success in the evolving banking industry.

    Connect with a JD Power Banking and Payments Intelligence expert.

    Contact Us

  • Why Apple Pay Later is Gaining Market Share So Quickly—And Who Should be Concerned

    Why Apple Pay Later is Gaining Market Share So Quickly—And Who Should be Concerned

    Banking and Payments Intelligence Report
    July 2023

     

    Why Apple Pay Later is Gaining Market Share So Quickly—And Who Should be Concerned

    The entire buy now pay later (BNPL) industry was put on notice when Apple announced the launch of Apple Pay Later in March. The new BNPL offering allows users to split purchases into four payments over six weeks with no interest or fees. 

    And while it has only been a few short months since its release, a recent JD Power survey of 8,000 consumers shows how quickly Apple is making its presence in the market known.

    Strong Out of the Gate

    According to JD Power survey respondents, Apple Pay Later has been used by more consumers than established brands such as Sezzle and Zip since its launch. Nearly one-fifth (19%) of BNPL customers used Apple Pay Later in its first three months. PayPal was still the most-used BNPL brand over the same period (39%), with Afterpay (33%) as the next-most used brand.

    The average Apple Pay Later user tended to be more financially healthy than most other BNPL customers, potentially giving it a more sustainable user base than its competitors. That said, Apple did attract a higher percentage of overextended users vs. other brands in its early days, which may have resulted from existing BNPL users’ willingness to try a new payment option from what they consider a trusted brand.

    Leveraging the Apple Name

    It should come as no surprise that Apple was able to gobble customers up from BNPL competitors almost immediately. Even after a tough 2022, the Apple brand is valued at $297.5 billion, making it the second most valuable brand in the world.

    The company is known for consistently delivering quality technology products that customers love, as seen in other JD Power studies. Customers report relatively high satisfaction with new Apple products when compared to solutions from companies with decades of experience in the same industry.

    With its BNPL solution, Apple continues strengthening its financial services catalog. But the company’s power doesn’t just come from its brand name. It also has a global network and vast resources to help it enter new markets seamlessly.

    Scaling Quickly

    Apple has some sizable advantages over its BNPL competitors, who had to attract users and build merchant acceptance one at a time. Apple was able to instantly tap its army of Apple Pay users and existing global acceptance footprint to create instant scale.

    The company immediately made Apple Pay Later available to millions of potential customers when it launched in March. That’s because Apple Pay Later can be used wherever Apple Pay is accepted, including over 85% of U.S. retailers, making it easy for consumers to access the service.

    From a technological standpoint, Apple Pay Later can be directly managed within Apple Wallet, available to any customer with a compatible iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, or Mac. The company will also integrate the BNPL solution into its app store, which saw more than 650 million average weekly visitors in 2022.

    A New Crop of Customers

    The research also suggests that Apple may be attracting first-time customers who otherwise may never have considered BNPL as their preferred payment method.

    JD Power survey responses indicated that early adopters of Apple Pay Later were more skeptical of BNPL. They were more likely to agree with the sentiment that “BNPL lenders are predatory.” They also responded with a lower-than-average agreement with the statements “BNPL options are helpful to consumers” and “BNPL is an option I wish I always had when buying things.” 

    This suggests many Apple Pay Later users may not have used BNPL through another provider before. Apple may be leveraging its strong brand image and easy-to-use solution to attract BNPL users who would never have otherwise considered it a viable payment option.

    Taking a Bite Out of the Competition

    Of its competitors, PayPal and Zip users were likelier than users of other BNPL brands to try Apple Pay Later. Seventeen percent of survey respondents who paid with PayPal most often and 17% who paid with Zip most often during the period said they tried Apple Pay Later as well. 

    Apple’s ability to attract shoppers who skew healthier and more skeptical of BNPL options may be most problematic for PayPal, which has traditionally attracted similar users. Meanwhile, Zip has a higher proportion of young customers who may be more likely to move to Apple Pay Later because of their affinity for Apple-branded products.

    Ultimately, no other BNPL company currently compares with Apple’s brand recognition, technological cachet, and network effects. Even PayPal, a traditional payments juggernaut with a large base of active BNPL users and a brand valued at $75 billion, has its work cut out to withstand Apple’s entry into this space. Time will tell if Apple’s growth in BNPL is fueled more by new users or migration of existing users from other brands but, either way, the tech-giant-turned-fintech is off to a conspicuous start.

    Find out More

    This Banking and Payments Intelligence Report is based on responses from 8,000 consumers in the United States and was fielded in May and June 2023. It was authored by Miles Tullo, Managing Director of Banking and Payments. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Mr. Tullo or to learn more about the underlying research.

     

    Media Contacts

    Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

     

  • Is U.S. EV Infrastructure Ready for the Great American Summer Road Trip? It Depends on Where You Want to Go.

    Is U.S. EV Infrastructure Ready for the Great American Summer Road Trip? It Depends on Where You Want to Go.

    E-Vision Intelligence Report
    July 2023

    Is U.S. EV Infrastructure Ready for the Great American Summer Road Trip? It Depends on Where You Want to Go.

    Key Findings 

    • Big Gaps in Western EV Corridor: Governors from eight Western states—Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming—committed to an initiative focused on creating an EV Corridor that will have EV charging stations within 50-100 miles of one another. Currently, many stretches between these states—and major summer tourist destinations like Zion National Park, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City—can reach upwards of 270 miles with limited charging availability, pushing the range limits of many popular EVs. 
    • Widespread State-by-State Variation in EV Operating Costs: The introduction of federal subsidies for EVs in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has significantly improved overall EV affordability but, at the state level, ownership costs vary considerably. For example, total 5-year operating costs for the popular F-150 Lightning is $1,010 cheaper in Texas than New York. 
    • Rivian Rises in the EV Pickup Discussion: Although the Ford F-150 Lightning is among the top vehicles considered, the Rivian R1T is gaining sales traction that puts it on par with F-150 Lightning sales for the past four months.

    Executive Summary

    Some 43.2 million people jumped in their cars for a summer road trip this July 4 weekend, according to AAA data, an increase of 2.4% during the past year and 4% higher than 2019. With record crowds continuing to swarm the nation’s national parks, hot spots like Zion, Yellowstone, Arches and others have made the western U.S. the ultimate destination for the Great American Road Trip. Which begs the question: Can you conquer the epic Western journey in an electric vehicle (EV)?

    Right now, the answer to that question really depends on your route. While several initiatives have been launched nationwide to spur EV infrastructure growth and make charging stations available across all major transportation corridors, there are still some big gaps in existing EV charging infrastructure.

    This E-Vision Intelligence Report dives into key data points trending in each monthly EV Index update, along with other data points gathered from JD Power studies and pulse surveys, to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in EV consumer sentiment.

    Go West! But Check a Charger Map First 

    Nationwide, consumer EV adoption continues to outpace charging infrastructure growth. According to the JD Power EV Index, infrastructure scores are down 4 points (on a 100-point index) in May 2023 vs. the same period in 2022. Charger availability continues to vary widely by state, with some states, like California, offering an average distance between charging ports of just 10 miles, and others, like Nebraska, stretching that average distance between chargers to 465 miles.

    That widespread variability of infrastructure puts the focus squarely on rural Western states like Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, which are prime destinations for summer road trippers out to visit the national parks and other bucket list destinations. In October 2017, the governors of these eight states signed a pact to work together to make it possible to seamlessly drive an EV across the western states’ major transportation corridors. This initiative set out to make charging stations available within every 50-100 miles, ensure they were accessible within 0.5 miles of a highway interchange or exit, and introduce other standards to make EV charging infrastructure ubiquitous. 

    According to JD Power EV Index data, they still have a long way to go. Through May 2023, the eight western states had a combined Infrastructure score of just 27.3, which is 7.7 index points lower than the national average. Colorado leads the way with a score of 39.9 and Idaho is lowest with a score of 16.2. 

    zip code level infrastructure highlights charging gaps

    Digging deeper, we find that some major routes could test the range limits of many current EVs. The route from Salt Lake City to Zion National Park, for example, is a 270-mile stretch in which EV charger availability is extremely limited. 

    Graph showing limited EV charging options in Utah

    Cost of Ownership Varies by State 

    It’s not just charging infrastructure availability that varies considerably on a state-to-state basis. While overall affordability scores are up 2.3 index points this month, some significant gaps are starting to emerge in total ownership cost at the state level. Largely driven by energy costs and variation in state incentives, total five-year operating costs for the F-150 Lightning is $1,010 higher in New York than it is in Texas, for example. 

    a graph

     

    Digging into specific EV models and specifications, costs vary even further. The Ford F-150 Lightning, for example, which is seeing the highest sales volumes in California, Florida, New York and Texas, varies in average total cost of ownership on a five-year purchase from a low of $82,740 in New York to a high of $94,031 in Texas, based on pricing calculated prior to Ford’s recently announced price cuts on the F-150 Lightning. 

    Speaking of Pick-Ups… 

    Any discussion of Great American Road Trips and the American love affair with the pick-up truck would not be complete without acknowledging recent sales and consideration trends in the category. The Ford F-150 Lightning has consistently scored high marks in terms of EV shopper consideration and currently ranks as the most-considered EV in the country this month. Not to be overlooked, however, the Rivian R1T has increased deliveries and has been giving Lightning a run for its EV truck sales crown over the last four months. It does raise the question of whether an upstart EV brand can compete in the land of the Big Three full-size pick-up. 

    Methodology 

    This JD Power E-Vision Intelligence Report is based on data and insights from the JD Power EV Index, the JD Power 2023 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience (EVX) Public Charging Study, and the JD Power 2023 U.S. Electric Vehicle Consideration (EVC) Study. The JD Power EV Index is an analytics tool to benchmark the growing EV market in the United States. It tracks millions of data points aggregated into six categories—interest, availability, adoption, affordability, infrastructure and experience—to evaluate the progress to parity of EVs with ICE vehicles in the U.S. Each month, the JD Power electric vehicle practice will analyze these data points, and others to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in consumer sentiment that are helping to define the fast-moving EV marketplace. 

    Find out More 

    This report was authored by Elizabeth Krear, vice president, electric vehicle practice; Brent Gruber, executive director, electric vehicle practice; Stewart Stropp, executive director, electric vehicle practice; and Kristen Richter, senior manager, electric vehicle practice. The JD Power E-Vision initiative is a company-wide program focused on maximizing JD Power industry-leading EV data, analytics, insights and solutions. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with the authors or to learn more about the underlying research. 

     

    Media Contacts 

    Shane Smith; East Coast; 424-903-3665; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected] 

     

  • With Financial Health Strained, Banks Should Fortify Security to Help Improve Customer Relationships

    With Financial Health Strained, Banks Should Fortify Security to Help Improve Customer Relationships

    Banking and Payments Intelligence Report
    July 2023

    With Financial Health Strained, Banks Should Fortify Security to Help Improve Customer Relationships

    As financial health remains stubbornly suppressed, banks are on the hunt for ways to improve customer relationships. According to the latest JD Power data, it appears that an increased focus on account security may be an effective way to accomplish that goal.

    Overall, 35% of bank customers in the United States have experienced some type of fraudulent activity on their credit or debit cards in the past 12 months. Curiously, though, only some banks are trying to take proactive steps to mitigate those occurrences. Just one-third of customers say they can recall prompts with a security review of their account.

    It’s an area of neglect that could have negative ramifications on bank customer satisfaction and loyalty. Rate-chasing has seemingly stalled out—31% have moved money from their primary bank, largely the same rate since February—and with customers stuck in a financial malaise, security could emerge as a major factor in customers’ decision to move their money. That means banks need to get serious about fraud quickly.

    More of the Same

    There has been no significant change in overall financial health. Nearly one-third (32%) of respondents are financially healthy, while 43% are vulnerable.

    A graph of a graph

Description automatically generated

    The overall level of inflation recognition fell slightly to 64%—a mark that is largely in line with the previous six months. The percentage of customers who said the price of goods is increasing faster than their income also mostly remained stable. There has been a slight rebound in customers’ overall satisfaction with their financial health, a potential harbinger of improved conditions.

    A graph with numbers and lines

Description automatically generated

    Fraud is Still Lurking

    Overall, 35% of banking customers say they have experienced at least one type of fraud in the past 12 months. That number increased to 47% for customers under age 40, and 50% of customers that are classified as financially overextended.

    Financial Health 2023 2

    The most common occurrences of fraud were someone making an unauthorized purchase with a customer’s credit (9%); an unauthorized purchase with a customer’s debit card (9%); and making a purchase with a P2P payment app that ended up being a scam (9%).

    Stepping Up the Security

    While customers have been taking steps to protect themselves against fraud—most notably, checking their statements for suspicious activity (44%) and checking their account activity (33%)—many are looking for support from their banks or card issuers. Unfortunately, that support is in rare supply.

    A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

    Just 36% of bank customers and 35% of credit card customers recall being prompted by their partner to review digital security settings in the past 30 days. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of stressed customers said they did not recall a security review.

    A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

    That seems like a lost opportunity for banks to not only improve relationships with their customers but forge a deeper level of trust, particularly among younger customers and those who are currently struggling financially. That’s because, when prompts do occur and customers act, the outcomes are largely positive. Nearly two-thirds (64%) felt instructions were completely clear and ended up being completely comfortable with security settings after a review.

    A close-up of a pie chart

Description automatically generated

     

    Lock Up the Loyalty

    As overall financial health remains stuck in neutral, customers are going to start basing their banking decisions on something other than financial literacy or new product offerings. Chief among those factors is the security of the accounts. An instance of fraud can send shockwaves through a customer’s account. It’s time for more banks to not just make it a priority, but relentlessly communicate to the customer what they are doing to help.

    Those that can do it stand to make massive inroads with younger customers. Customers under 40 are victims of fraud more often, and they’re also less likely to stick with their primary bank because of familiarity. Winning those customers is key to moving forward, and there’s no better time to earn their trust than when they’re already your customers. Now is the time to move on security.

    Find out More

    This Banking and Payments Intelligence Report is based on responses from 4,000 retail bank customers nationwide and was fielded in June 2023. It was authored by Jennifer White, senior director of banking and payments intelligence at JD Power. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Ms. White or to learn more about the underlying research.

    Media Contacts

    Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

     

  • Webinar: Increasing Advisor Satisfaction

    Increasing Advisor Satisfaction: The Power of Collaboration and Professional Development

    How can asset managers provide advisors more time to focus on delivering quality advice and pave the way for continuous professional development? JD Power and 4U Platform have combined attitudinal insights with behavioral data to give asset managers actionable steps to prioritize tools and resources to increase advisor satisfaction and deliver effective advisory to investors. 

    Watch this engaging and insightful panel discussion hosted by 4U Platform on leveraging professional development to enhance advisor satisfaction. This expert panel will explore the transformative power of continuous learning and growth in the advisory field.

    • Discover key findings from the JD Power 2023 Financial Advisor Satisfaction Study.
    • Hear from industry-leading asset management and wealth management companies to learn how they are driving advisor satisfaction by bringing the right resources to advisors.
    • Learn how technology and innovation are helping industry leaders collaborate to make product, marketing, and professional development content efficiently and easily accessible for advisors.


    Click to watch webinar

     

    Watch Now

     

  • American Bank Customers Trying to Make Inroads in Paying Down Debt, Even as Inflation Recognition Increases

    American Bank Customers Trying to Make Inroads in Paying Down Debt, Even as Inflation Recognition Increases

    Banking and Payments Intelligence Report
    August 2023

     

    American Bank Customers Trying to Make Inroads in Paying Down Debt, Even as Inflation Recognition Increases

    Compared with this time last year, banking customers in the United States must feel at ease. All financial indicators seem to indicate that inflation is waning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up nearly 1,000 points year over year. Finally, it appears customers have a chance to breathe, right? Not quite.

    According to the latest JD Power data, even as economic indicators improve, customer response is not showing a slowdown in the effect of higher prices. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of consumers postponed a bigger purchase in the past month due to lingering inflation, compared with 48% in October 2021, and the rate of customers who said the cost of goods is increasing faster than their income reached a six-month high.

    Still, customers are trying to course correct from the past 18 months of financial volatility. Bank customers are trying to use some newly found wiggle room at the checkout counter to help pay down any debt they accrued to keep their finances afloat. Unfortunately, most are doing it on their own, without the help of their financial institutions or card issuers. 

    Inflation Fatigue

    There has been no significant change in overall financial health. Nearly one-third (31%) of respondents are financially healthy, while 44% are vulnerable.

    Graph 1

    Despite inflation continuing to ease, the overall level of inflation recognition among customers rose sharply to 70%—the highest mark in the past six months. There was an increase in all customers segments when asked if the price of goods is increasing faster than their income and, surprisingly, the biggest increase was among health customers (8 percentage points). 

    With the current inflation rate hovering close to 3% (down from more than 8% a year ago), these numbers may be a cumulative effect, suggesting fatigue among bank customers.

    Graph 2

    Budgeting Assistance

    To help customers through this malaise, banks have begun to be more proactive in offering budgeting assistance. Overall, 46% of banking customers say their bank has proactively reached out to them about budgeting assistance. That number increased to 65% among customers under age 40, and 71% of customers that are classified as financially overextended. 

    Graph 3

    The most common occurrences of banks offering budgeting assistance were ads on their website or mobile app (19%); a mailer about budgeting assistance (16%); directed customers to where budgeting tools are located on their website or mobile app (16%); and offered incentive to customers to encourage use of their budgeting tools (12%).

    Paying Down Debt

    Some customers have managed the 2022 inflation explosion by taking on more debt, and many are now trying to take steps to dig out of these deficits Three-fourths (75%) of customers indicate they have paid down debt in the past 12 months, while 33% are not aware of any credit card services to aide in this quest. 

    Graph 4

    When asked how customers are paying down debt, 30% said they have stopped adding new debt (a strategy likely aided by easing inflation). More than one-fourth (26%) said they have cut expenses and used the extra money for repayment, and 18% said they have found a new source of income (18%). Nearly one-fifth (19%)  said they are only paying their minimum due.

    Graph 5

    What’s noteworthy is that many customers are pursuing this debt repayment without any professional advice. Less than 10% are getting professional advice about their repayment. When asked what specific services card issuers offer to help in debt repayment, 43% said they were not aware of any service to manage debt. The rate was highest among customers over age 40 (41%) and customers that are stressed (39%).

    Graph 6

    This seems like a lost opportunity for banks and card issuers to not only improve relationships with their customers but forge a deeper level of trust, particularly among younger customers and those who are currently struggling financially. That’s because, when prompts do occur and customers act, the outcomes are largely positive. 

    Lending a Hand

    While the macro-economic landscape is improving, the ripple effects of the past 18 months will continue to show up in customer sentiment. Some bank customers have gotten creative to bridge the gap, and it’s clear that many are now making strides to get back on solid ground.

    As they do, both banks and card issuers could earn plenty of goodwill by recognizing these goals and being even more proactive about helping customers achieve them. Customer outreach can build trust in both financial assistance tools and a bank or issuer’s overall brand. That trust will likely result in loyalty and increased satisfaction over time. As the storm eases, customers will remember who helped them rebuild. Now is the time to forge that bond.

    Find out More

    This Banking and Payments Intelligence Report is based on responses from 4,000 retail bank customers nationwide and was fielded in July 2023. It was authored by Jennifer White, senior director of banking and payments intelligence at JD Power. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Ms. White or to learn more about the underlying research.

     

    Media Contacts

    Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

  • America Grows Increasingly Divided on EV Adoption

    America Grows Increasingly Divided on EV Adoption

    E-Vision Intelligence Report
    August 2023

    America Grows Increasingly Divided on EV Adoption

    Key Findings

    • Divided States of EV Adoption: Nationwide, electric vehicle (EV) adoption is up 1 index point through the first half of 2023 vs. the same period a year ago. At the state level, however, a stark division is emerging between the top 10 states for EV adoption, where EV adoption rates are growing steadily, and the bottom 10 states for EV adoption, where year-over-year average adoption rates are declining. 
    • 2035 Forecast Shows Increasingly Uneven Adoption Rates Across U.S.: New JD Power EV Retail Share Forecast captures granular EV sales, consideration, pricing, infrastructure growth and other census and demographic factors to project state-by-state EV adoption rates through 2035. California is projected to reach 94% EV share in that time, while North Dakota may not even break the 20% threshold and Michigan will reach just 41%.
    • Affordability Skewed by Aggressive Tesla Pricing: Overall EV affordability is up 15 index points through the first half of 2023 but that number is being skewed by heavy discounts on Tesla vehicles. During the next several months, as we see an influx of new EV SUVs and trucks from the likes of Chevrolet, Cadillac and Tesla, we expect to see a great deal of volatility in overall EV affordability scores.

     Executive Summary

    To the long list of literal and figurative lines of demarcation that illustrate the sharp geographic, political, socioeconomic and cultural divisions between states in the United States, we may now add the EV adopters and the EV holdouts. According to the latest data from JD Power, EV adoption in America is growing increasingly divided, with the most active states for EV adoption already on the path to parity with internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and consumers steadily pulling back on EV purchases in the least-active states.

    How will that trend play out in the next decade, and which states are leading the EV charge and which ones are slow to transition? This E-Vision Intelligence Report dives into key data points trending in each monthly EV Index update, along with other data points gathered from JD Power studies and pulse surveys, to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in EV consumer sentiment.

    EV Sovereignty Across the United States

    On a nationwide basis, EV adoption rates have continued to rise steadily, with EV sales now representing 8.6% of the total new-vehicle retail market. On a year-over-year basis, overall EV adoption is up 1 point on our 100-point index, bringing the total Adoption score to 21. What’s underneath that nationwide score, however, is significant variation on a state-by-state basis.

    Increasingly, the U.S. is being split into two camps when it comes to EV adoption: those states who’ve been aggressive about offering incentives and building infrastructure to support EVs and those that have not. Accordingly, the top 10 states with the highest overall EV adoption rates—California, Washington, Hawaii, Oregon, Nevada, Maryland, Arizona, Colorado, Utah and Massachusetts—have continued to see EV adoption rates grow steadily, climbing year-over-year through the first half of 2023. Meanwhile, the states with the lowest levels of EV adoption—Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Wyoming, Louisiana, South Dakota, West Virginia and North Dakota—have gone in the opposite direction, with adoption rates declining on average in the first half of 2023. 

    Top 10 EV Adoption states see adoption improve since 2022, but bottom states get notably worse.

    2035 Forecast Puts California EV Share at 94%, Michigan, not So Much

    JD Power has just introduced a new EV Retail Share Forecast, which captures granular EV sales, consideration, pricing, infrastructure growth and other census and demographic factors to project state-by-state EV adoption rates through 2035. Updated twice per year, the forecast projects EV adoption rates by segment by state and designated market area (DMA) and offers insights into the specific variables contributing to projected growth rates. 

    At a nationwide level, the EV Retail Share Forecast anticipates a baseline estimate of 70% EV market share by 2035. In line with the state-level trends discussed above, however, those projections vary considerably by state. California, for example, which currently has the highest EV adoption rate in the nation, is projected to reach 94% market share by 2035. North Dakota, by contrast, which currently has the lowest EV adoption rate, is projected to have a 19% EV market share by 2035. Similarly, South Dakota is projected to reach just 35% share and Michigan is projected to reach 41% share by 2035.

    a broad spectrum of EV share is forecasted across the states

    Luxury EVs Still Wield Outsize Influence on Affordability

    While true parity between the EV and ICE vehicle markets will only be achieved when manufacturers produce more mainstream EVs, the recent news cycle has been dominated with updates on luxury SUVs and trucks like the new Escalade IQ from Cadillac and the Tesla Cybertruck. Even among current EV sales, total affordability scores are being heavily influenced by the Tesla models, which have recently undergone a series of price cuts that has increased their overall affordability. Industry-wide, Tesla currently accounts for 63% of all EV sales year to date.

    Driven largely by Tesla, the luxury market skew that currently exists in the EV market has resulted in overall affordability scores improving 15 (on a 100-point scale) through the first half of this year. However, as buyers make their way through this growth phase of the EV marketplace, we expect to see continued volatility as new models are introduced and manufacturers continue to put their marketing budgets behind high-priced, halo EVs.

    At 97, affordability reaches parity, largely driven by Tesla, but in highest-volume segments, parity is out of reach.

    Methodology

    This JD Power E-Vision Intelligence Report is based on data and insights from the JD Power EV Index and the JD Power EV Retail Share Forecast. The JD Power EV Index is an analytics tool to benchmark the growing EV market in the United States. It tracks millions of data points aggregated into six categories—interest, availability, adoption, affordability, infrastructure and experience—to evaluate the progress to parity of EVs with ICE vehicles in the U.S. Each month, the JD Power electric vehicle practice will analyze these data points, and others to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in consumer sentiment that are helping to define the fast-moving EV marketplace. 

    Find out More

    This report was authored by Elizabeth Krear, vice president, electric vehicle practice; Brent Gruber, executive director, electric vehicle practice; Stewart Stropp, executive director, electric vehicle practice; and Kristen Richter, senior manager, electric vehicle practice. The JD Power E-Vision initiative is a company-wide program focused on maximizing JD Power industry-leading EV data, analytics, insights and solutions. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with the authors or to learn more about the underlying research.

     

    Media Contacts

    Shane Smith; East Coast; 424-903-3665; [email protected]

    Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]